dr.David
Rhodus
The bookREFERENCE COLLECTION Contents
Appendix AE219 / 232

Readiness and Stage-Gate Templates

Operating Quantum Computers · 1 min read

This appendix provides reusable templates for readiness reviews, gate decisions, risk-adjusted funding, and adoption playbooks.

Readiness packet template

DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
Readiness packet template · Figure 1
View diagram source
flowchart TB
    Packet[Readiness packet] --> Summary[One-page summary]
    Packet --> Scope[Scope and exclusions]
    Packet --> Evidence[Evidence inventory]
    Packet --> Risks[Risk register]
    Packet --> Cost[Cost estimate]
    Packet --> Decision[Requested decision]
Field Required content
workload name stable identifier
maturity level current readiness level
requested gate gate being reviewed
classical baseline baseline method and owner
target profile simulator, QPU, provider, or lab stack
evidence links manifests, result distributions, notebooks, review notes
risks top risks and mitigations
cost historical and projected spend
decision requested advance, constrain, defer, pivot, or kill

Gate decision record

DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
Gate decision record · Figure 2
View diagram source
sequenceDiagram
    participant Submitter
    participant Board
    participant Recorder
    Submitter->>Board: present packet
    Board->>Board: review evidence and gaps
    Board-->>Recorder: decision and conditions
    Recorder-->>Submitter: decision record
Illustrative listing · yaml
gate_decision:
  id: qgate-0001
  workload: workload-name
  gate: hardware-evidence-readiness
  decision: approve_with_constraints
  constraints:
    - only valid on target family X
    - expires after 60 days or target compiler upgrade
  required_followups:
    - owner: evidence-lead
      action: add replication run
      due: 2026-06-01

Readiness scoring rubric

DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
Readiness scoring rubric · Figure 3
View diagram source
flowchart LR
    Score[Readiness score] --> Problem[Problem]
    Score --> Algorithm[Algorithm]
    Score --> Hardware[Hardware]
    Score --> Evidence[Evidence]
    Score --> Cost[Cost]
    Score --> Support[Support]
Score Meaning
0 not assessed
1 exploratory
2 demonstrated in controlled setting
3 repeatable with known constraints
4 governed and supportable
5 production-grade for the declared scope

Risk-adjusted funding request

DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
Risk-adjusted funding request · Figure 4
View diagram source
flowchart TB
    Request[Funding request] --> Objective[Decision enabled]
    Request --> Cost[Cost]
    Request --> Uncertainty[Uncertainty reduced]
    Request --> Alternatives[Alternatives]
    Request --> Stop[Stop condition]
Illustrative listing · yaml
funding_request:
  objective: reduce provider-risk uncertainty for workload family A
  amount: 75000
  duration_days: 45
  expected_decision: choose primary provider or exit workload
  alternatives:
    - continue simulation only
    - defer until target generation changes
  kill_condition: no statistically useful improvement over baseline

Industry playbook skeleton

DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
Industry playbook skeleton · Figure 5
View diagram source
flowchart LR
    Industry[Industry] --> Risks[Risks]
    Industry --> UseCases[Use cases]
    Industry --> Gates[Gates]
    Industry --> Owners[Owners]
    Industry --> Metrics[Metrics]

Use this skeleton for finance, pharma, materials, logistics, energy, telecom, aerospace, or public-sector variants.