dr.David
Rhodus
The bookREFERENCE COLLECTION Contents
Appendix F194 / 232

Vendor Evaluation Scorecards

Operating Quantum Computers · 1 min read

This appendix provides practical scorecards for evaluating quantum hardware, cloud access, software tooling, and operational maturity.

F.1 Vendor scorecard

Category Weight Evidence Score
hardware quality 25 fidelity, topology, stability, uptime 0-5
tooling and APIs 15 SDKs, primitives, IR support, documentation 0-5
operations 20 calibration reports, incident process, queue policy 0-5
data and provenance 15 raw shots, metadata, export, retention 0-5
security and governance 10 access control, tenant isolation, compliance 0-5
economics 10 cost per accepted result, reservation model 0-5
roadmap credibility 5 delivered milestones, transparent limits 0-5
DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
F.1 Vendor scorecard · Figure 1
View diagram source
flowchart TB
    Score[Vendor score] --> Hardware[Hardware]
    Score --> Tooling[Tooling]
    Score --> Ops[Operations]
    Score --> Data[Data]
    Score --> Security[Security]
    Score --> Economics[Economics]
    Score --> Roadmap[Roadmap]

F.2 Benchmark worksheet

Illustrative listing · yaml
vendor_benchmark_score:
  vendor: string
  backend: string
  benchmark_id: string
  date: date
  hardware:
    topology_score: int
    stability_score: int
    performance_score: int
  operations:
    queue_score: int
    incident_score: int
    metadata_score: int
  economics:
    cost_per_successful_result: number
    reservation_cost: number
  decision:
    recommendation: scale | pilot | hold | exit
    rationale: string
DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
F.2 Benchmark worksheet · Figure 2
View diagram source
flowchart LR
    Benchmark[Benchmark] --> Scores[Scores]
    Scores --> Weighted[Weighted total]
    Weighted --> Decision{Decision}
    Decision -- scale --> Scale[Scale]
    Decision -- pilot --> Pilot[Pilot]
    Decision -- hold --> Hold[Hold]
    Decision -- exit --> Exit[Exit]

F.3 Red flags

Red flags should block procurement until resolved:

  • no access to raw results,
  • no calibration provenance,
  • benchmark-only tuning with no disclosure,
  • vague queue policy,
  • no incident process,
  • roadmap claims without delivered milestones,
  • security review gaps,
  • contract terms that prevent reproducibility.
DIAGRAM
Diagram loads as you read
F.3 Red flags · Figure 3
View diagram source
flowchart TD
    RedFlag[Red flag] --> Block[Block decision]
    Block --> Remediate[Remediation plan]
    Remediate --> Evidence[Evidence review]
    Evidence --> Clear{Resolved?}
    Clear -- yes --> Continue[Continue evaluation]
    Clear -- no --> Exit[Exit]